I’ve been out of the loop for a while, what with tap dancing and party planning and all manner of needless distraction, so I’m just now getting back into the news of the world. Oh, okay, not the world, just my own country. I’ll get back to the world tomorrow. What’s the hurry? The world’s problems will always be with us. Sensationalized American news stories only stay relevant for so long.
Tempest-in-a-teapot stories have the shortest shelf lives, so I’ll start there. I’ve been reading about this remark that Barack Obama made at a fundraiser a little over a week ago:
But the truth is, is that, our challenge is to get people persuaded that we can make progress when there’s not evidence of that in their daily lives. You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.
Now, that’s offensive on a couple different levels, but not something I would have considered noteworthy, were it not for the fact that Hillary Clinton responded by calling Obama’s remarks “elitist.” Excuse me for just a minute.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Okay, sorry about that, couldn’t be helped. Seriously, Hil? Seriously? I mean, I expect this sort of commentary from right-wingers, who are quick to take umbrage at lefties calling folks racist gun-nut Jesus freaks just because they don’t always vote their pocketbooks the way they should. But are you really trying to tell me that you yourself don’t personally subscribe to every word of Obama’s ill-considered characterization of Pennsylvanians who aren’t buying what he’s selling?
Oh, sure, you’d be smart enough not to say anything until after you lost the primary. True, true, there’s a lot to be said for timely elitism as opposed to premature elitism. But still. Seriously?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Ah, that’s a good one.
Speaking of Hillary and her famous non-elitism, I wish she’d stop dropping the g’s from her -ing verbs whenever she gets in front of an audience she suspects is less educated than she is. Her husband can get away with that that. He’s from Arkansas. George W. Bush can get away with it, too, because he talks like an uncultured rube in front of everyone. Hillary, on the other hand, needs to just stop it. right. now. because it’s getting on my nerves. Seriously–no, really, seriously serious this time, no laughing–it is not even remotely endearing because it is so obviously phony and condescending. As Obama might say, you’re likeable enough, Hillary. Just be yourself and don’t try so hard.
I said, no laughing!
This one is a little musty, but in the interest of bipartisan sniping, I am also going to condemn my fellow right-wing nutjobs for commenting on Obama’s recent remarks about the importance of sex education. Speaking of his own daughters, ages 9 and 6, he said, “I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.” He also said he wouldn’t want them punished with a sexually transmitted disease. So naturally social conservatives jumped on this and said it demonstrates that Obama must think the following:
Baby = Punishment
Baby = STD
And then they said it was understandable, given that Obama has something like a 100 rating from NARAL. If he favors abortion, of course he thinks babies are punishments! They’re like STD’s!
Okay, number one, that’s stupid.
Number two, just drop the “every child is a blessing no matter what circumstances he or she is born under” business because I don’t hear this kind of rhetoric when the subject is how much out-of-wedlock births hurt our society.
Number three, Obama may be “articulate” and “clean,” but he’s still a mortal man. Honest people should concede that this was just an imperfect way of saying, “Having a baby when you’re a teenager tends to screw up your life.” Is it a death sentence? Is it the end of the world? No, but it’s still not every father’s dream for his little girl. Nor is an STD, for that matter. So let’s just drop this and focus on him being an elitist. Hillary needs our help.
Well, that’s it for today. I’ve got some lunch to make and some babies to be punished by. Catch you crazy kids later.

14 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 15, 2008 at 11:13 am
wpabchen
The Democrats have a dilemma: Obama can win the nomination, but not the general electron, whereas the opposite applies to Hillary Clinton. Here are the reasons: using the 2004 presidential election results as a reference, the 2008 general election will essentially be divided between the ‘red’ and ‘blue’ states. The advantages that Obama had with the black voters and the caucus process can disappear easily in those ‘red’ states in the general election. On the other hand, Hillary has been able to capture most of the blue states in the primary, despite strong completions from Obama. When weighing in different voters compositions (races and genders) and the general perception about the candidates, Obama may lose one or two of big blue states such as CA, NY and PA, besides Ohio. On the other hand, Clinton has a very good chance to keep all the blue states in the camp, besides being favored in Ohio and Arkansas, and possibly FL.
I wrote these comments before the exposition of Wright’s preaching and his relation with Obama, which could further handicap Obama in the general election. Thus, if democrats do not understand the above message, McCain will be the next president. What’s wrong about McCain being the next president? He is a little old, too stubborn, and committed too much to the Iraq war. Any person who does not understand that our nation has deteriorated in the past few years because of the Iraq war does not deserve to be our next president. So, Obama and Clinton supporters, please do not dog fight anymore. If you do, you may become the victim in the old Chinese saying “Fish and clam fight, the fisherman profits”. Please also understand that voting for Obama in the primary is equivalent to supporting McCain for the next president. Please think about this carefully.
April 15, 2008 at 11:46 am
bythelbs
Was that an automated comment?
Anywho, good observations. I’m not spending much time listening to Hillary, so I haven’t noticed her “when in Rome” speak. I’ll have to start paying more attention so I can fully appreciate how annoying it is and mock her accordingly. Oh and I guess so I can make an informed decision come November. But mostly that mocking thing.
I would never be able to run for public office or even the PTA for that matter since my verbal spewage would not withstand any degree of scrutiny. Baby=STD Ha!
April 15, 2008 at 12:51 pm
Mark IV
bythelbs,
If you want to laugh yourself silly watching youtube video, do a google search for Kentucky Fried Hillary.
April 15, 2008 at 1:58 pm
Amber @ Soggy Cheerios
I disagree with WPA- I think not only can Obama win the nomination and the general election- he WILL.
Next to the definition of ‘elitist’ in the dictionary there is a picture of the Clintons.
April 15, 2008 at 2:02 pm
cheryl
The Clinton’s are the Kennedy’s on crack. That might have come out wrong, but I know what I meant. And I admire me a Kennedy.
I’m not paying attention to the Dem. nomination like I should. I’m sure I’ll care once I know who’s running. Sounds a tad unpatriotic, but like madhousewife, I’m too busy with my STD’s –I mean, my kids…
April 15, 2008 at 2:29 pm
bythelbs
Thanks, Mark IV. I feel I have sufficient information now to join the mocking. I also enjoyed the “Hillary talks jive”. What is her dealio?
April 15, 2008 at 3:18 pm
Wayne
“calling folks racist gun-nut Jesus freaks just because they don’t always vote their pocketbooks the way they should”
Right, because that is exactly what he meant.
April 15, 2008 at 3:19 pm
Wayne
Oh, never mind me, this is a humorous post and I’m not responding properly to it. I am just bitter in general, and I don’t even believe in God or own a gun.
April 16, 2008 at 8:10 am
madhousewife
Just so we’re clear, I don’t think Obama really considers rural Pennsylvanians racist gun-nut Jesus freaks. That’s a pretty hateful characterization, and I don’t think Obama’s a hater. I think he’s condescending, but not any more so than the average politician. McCain has contempt for ordinary people, too, but he’s more of a hater. Maybe that’s why he charms me.
April 16, 2008 at 8:21 am
madhousewife
I actually find it painful to listen to Hillary talking jive. That video doesn’t have her “AH DON’ FEEL NOWAYZ TARD!” line, does it? That one just makes me want to crawl in a hole, I’m so humiliated for her.
April 16, 2008 at 9:06 am
bythelbs
Oh yes it does. It’s really bizarre. When I watched it I wondered what kind of weird tension their was in the room—were people uncomfortable and kind of squirming in their seats? I was and I was just sitting by myself watching it on youtube.
April 16, 2008 at 9:07 am
bythelbs
That should be there was. Darn those homonyms!
April 16, 2008 at 2:36 pm
Wayne
I know. I responded earnestly to your irony, which was absurd. That’s why I took it back. I know you don’t really like Obama’s a hater.
April 16, 2008 at 2:41 pm
Wayne
Think.